const f = (a, b) => a.concat(b.map(String))
const r = f([0], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]);
const f = (a, b) => a.concat(b.map(String))
const r = f([0], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Rest | |
Array |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Rest | 2227764.5 Ops/sec |
Array | 2313489.2 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases for you.
Benchmark Definition:
The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for concatenating arrays in JavaScript:
...b
) with the spread operator (...
).b
).Options Compared:
In this benchmark, the following options are compared:
...b
)b
)Pros and Cons of Each Approach:
...b
):b
):Library and Its Purpose:
In the test case "Rest", the String
function is used, which is a built-in JavaScript library. The purpose of using String
here is likely to ensure that the concatenation operation happens at the string level (using the map
method), rather than at the array level.
Special JS Feature or Syntax:
In this benchmark, no special JavaScript features or syntax are used. However, rest parameters were introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and have been supported by most modern browsers since then.
Other Alternatives:
If you wanted to test different approaches for concatenating arrays, you could consider adding more options to the benchmark definition, such as:
Array.prototype.concat()
with two separate arrays.These alternatives might provide interesting insights into performance and readability aspects of different techniques.