Benchmark: RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match for lists

Script Preparation code:

var list = [
    '0815.ru',
    '10minutemail.com',
    '10minutenmail.xyz',
    '126.com',
    '1email.eu',
    '1vbb.de',
    '20minutemail.com',
    '24-mail.de',
    '3d-painting.com',
    '5x2.de',
    'aircln.ru',
    'a2mac1',
    'anpa.de',
    'antichef.net',
    'aol.de',
    'aol.com',
    'arcor.com',
    'arcor.de',
    'azamat-farisovich.ru',
    'beefmilk.com',
    'bigcitymail.de',
    'bio-muesli.info',
    'bio-muesli.net',
    'byom.de',
    'canineworld.com',
    'chattler.de',
    'compu-freemail.de',
    'cust.in',
    'designereasy.ru',
    'despammed.com',
    'DingBone.com',
    'directbox.com',
    'directbox.de',
    'directbox.net',
    'discardmail.com',
    'discardmail.de',
    'dome-camp.ru',
    'dontsendmespam.de',
    'eclipso.at',
    'eclipso.ch',
    'eclipso.com',
    'eclipso.de',
    'eclipso.eu',
    'edv.to',
    'email.lu',
    'emailias.com',
    'emailn.de',
    'ero-tube.org',
    'exox.de',
    'eyepaste.com',
    'film-blog.biz',
    'firemail.com',
    'firemail.de',
    'freemail-24.com',
    'freemailer.ch',
    'freenet.com',
    'freenet.de',
    'freespin.ru',
    'FudgeRub.com',
    'geschent.biz',
    'gmail.',
    'gmx.',
    'googlemail.',
    'great-host.in',
    'guerillamail.org',
    'guru.com',
    'guru.de',
    'h3c.de',
    'hotmail.',
    'hushmail.com',
    'imails.info',
    'icloud.com',
    'jetable.com',
    'k.st',
    'k-bg.de',
    'kuekomail.net',
    'kulturbetrieb.info',
    'kurzepost.de',
    'live.',
    'logomail.com',
    'logomail.de',
    'LookUgly.com',
    'lycos.com',
    'lycos.de',
    'mail.at',
    'mail.com',
    'mail.de',
    'mail.ru',
    'mail1a.de',
    'mail4nature.org',
    'mail4trash.com',
    'mailde.de',
    'mailexpire.com',
    'maili.com',
    'maili.de',
    'mailinator.com',
    'mailjunky.com',
    'mailjunky.de',
    'mailnull.com',
    'mc-free.com',
    'mc-free.de',
    'modellraketen.de',
    'muellmail.com',
    'nervmich.net',
    'nervtmich.net',
    'nomail2me.com',
    'noxamail.de',
    'nurfuerspam.de',
    'objectmail.com',
    'o-taxi31.ru',
    'outlook.',
    'overmail.com',
    'overmail.de',
    'owlpic.com',
    'oyoony.at',
    'oyoony.com',
    'oyoony.de',
    'oyoony.net',
    'pantagor-gel.ru',
    'proxymail.eu',
    'protonmail.',
    'posteo.',
    'rcpt.at',
    'recode.me',
    'rediffmail.com',
    's0ny.net',
    'sandelf.de',
    'saturnbet-official.ru',
    'sbdautomotive.com',
    'sbdautomotive.de',
    'sify.com',
    'simbamail.com',
    'simbamail.de',
    'skymail.at',
    'skymail.com',
    'skymail.de',
    'slucia.com',
    'smart-mail.com',
    'smart-mail.de',
    'SmellFear.com',
    'sneakemail.com',
    'snkmail.com',
    'sofort-mail.de',
    'softhome.net',
    'spam.la',
    'spambog.com',
    'spambog.de',
    'spambog.ru',
    'spamex.com',
    'spamfreemail.com',
    'spamfreemail.de',
    'spamgourmet.com',
    'spammotel.com',
    'spamtrail.com',
    'speed-mailer.com',
    'spl.at',
    'spoofmail.de',
    'squizzy.de',
    'streamup.ru',
    'super-auswahl.de',
    'techmail.com',
    'techmail.de',
    'teewars.org',
    'tempemail.net',
    't-online.com',
    't-online.de',
    'toplinktap.ru',
    'trash2009.com',
    'trashmail.at',
    'trash-mail.at',
    'trashmail.com',
    'trash-mail.com',
    'trashmail.',
    'ueberschuss.de',
    'uims.com',
    'uims.de',
    'uni.com',
    'uni.de',
    'urhen.com',
    'usn-dlya-ipe.ru',
    'valyutniy-kontrol.ru',
    'vcmail.de',
    'vpomosmame.ru',
    'watchfull.net',
    'watch-harry-potter.com',
    'web.de',
    'wegwerfadresse.de',
    'wegwerfemail.de',
    'wegwerf-email.net',
    'wegwerfemailadresse.com',
    'wegwerfmail.de',
    'wegwerfmail.net',
    'wegwerfmail.org',
    'wetacompany.ru',
    'willhackforfood.biz',
    'wunschdomain.xy',
    'x-mail.net',
    'yahoo.',
    'yandex.',
    'yopmail.com',
    'zelx.de',
    'znam-ya.ru',
    'zzrgg.com',
    'p3-group.com',
    'caresoftglobal.com',
];
var regex = new RegExp(
    `@(${list.map((d) =>
    d.replace(/[-[\]{}()*+?.,\\/^$|#\s]/g, '\\$&')
  ).join('|')})`
);
var string = 'test123@10minutenmail.xyz';

Tests:

RegEx.test
return regex.test(string);
String.includes
for (var i = 0; i < list.length; i++) { if (string.includes(list[i])) { return true; } } return false;
String.match
return string.match(regex).length > 0;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
RegEx.test
String.includes
String.match

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

It looks like we have a set of benchmarking data for three different JavaScript tests:

1. `RegEx.test`: This test uses a regular expression to check if the input string matches a specific pattern. The regex is defined as `@(${list.map((d) => d.replace(/[-[\\]{}()*+?.,\\\\/^$|#\\s]/g, '\\$&')).join('|')})`, where `list` contains a list of domain names.

2. `String.includes`: This test checks if the input string includes any of the values in the `list` array.

3. `String.match`: This test uses a regular expression to match the input string against a pattern defined as `regex`.

The latest benchmark results show:

* For `RegEx.test`, Chrome 115 on Windows achieves an average of 8,505,132 executions per second.
* For `String.match`, Chrome 115 on Windows achieves an average of 728,916.7 executions per second.
* For `String.includes`, Chrome 115 on Windows achieves an average of 2,083,700.375 executions per second.

It's worth noting that these results are likely to vary depending on the specific system configuration, JavaScript engine version, and other factors.

Based on these benchmarking results, we can't make a general conclusion about which test is faster without more context or information about the system configurations used for each test. However, it appears that `String.includes` might be slightly faster than `RegEx.test`, while both are slower than `String.match`.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/115.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 115 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
RegEx.test	8505132.0 Ops/sec
String.includes	2083700.4 Ops/sec
String.match	7289167.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match for lists (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: RegEx.test vs String.includes vs String.match

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

RegEx.test

String.includes

String.match

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):