var string = "Hello world!";
var regex = /hello/i;
regex.test(string);
string.includes("Hello".toLowerCase());
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
RegEx.test | |
String.includes |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
RegEx.test | 47876868.0 Ops/sec |
String.includes | 1615250688.0 Ops/sec |
Benchmark Explanation
The provided benchmark, "RegEx.test vs. String.includes vs. String.match insensitive", measures the performance of three different approaches to search for a substring in a string:
/i
flag at the end of the regex makes it case-insensitive.RegEx.test
, with the /i
flag.Options Compared
The three methods are compared on their execution performance. The benchmark aims to determine which method is the fastest for this specific use case.
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
regex.test(string)
followed by regex.exec(string)
).
Cons:RegEx.test
with the /i
flag. Pros:RegEx.test
.
Cons: Same cons as RegEx.test
.Library and Purpose
None are explicitly mentioned in the provided benchmark definition.
Special JS Features or Syntax
There are none mentioned, but it's worth noting that JavaScript's regex engine is quite powerful and can handle complex patterns. If you're interested in testing regex performance, this benchmark might be a good starting point.
Other Alternatives
Some alternative approaches to search for substrings in strings include:
String.includes
, but returns the index of the first occurrence or -1 if not found.fn-match
or fn-matches
, which can provide better performance and flexibility than built-in JavaScript methods.Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on your specific use case and requirements. For simple substring searches, String.includes
might be sufficient. For more complex regex patterns or other scenarios, RegEx.test
or String.match insensitive
might be a better fit.