Benchmark: Long regex test vs string includes

Script Preparation code:

var string = "HelaasdfgafsdfsfdsadfsadfsadsadgfdgaesssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssHello world!";
var regex = /Hello/;

Tests:

regex
regex.test(string);
includes
string.includes("Hello");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
regex
includes

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition is represented by two JSON objects: `Script Preparation Code` and `Html Preparation Code`. These codes are executed before running the actual benchmark test.

In this case, we have:

* `Script Preparation Code`: This code defines a string variable `string` containing the text "Hello world!" and a regular expression variable `regex` with the pattern "/Hello/".
* `Html Preparation Code`: This field is empty, indicating that no HTML preparation is needed for this benchmark.

**Options being compared**

The two test cases being compared are:

1. `regex.test(string);`
2. `string.includes("Hello");`

These two tests are designed to measure the performance of JavaScript's built-in regular expression engine versus a simple string inclusion method using the `includes()` method.

**Pros and Cons**

Here's a brief analysis of each approach:

* **Regular Expression Engine (`regex.test(string);`)**:
	+ Pros: Regular expressions offer a flexible way to search for patterns in strings. This implementation may be suitable when dealing with complex pattern matching.
	+ Cons: Regular expression engines can be slower than simple string operations due to the overhead of parsing and executing the regex pattern.
* **Simple String Inclusion (`string.includes("Hello");`)**:
	+ Pros: String inclusion is a simple, lightweight operation that typically has low overhead. This approach may be suitable when dealing with small strings or short searches.
	+ Cons: The `includes()` method may not work as expected if the search string is not found at the beginning of the string.

**Library and syntax**

There are no notable libraries being used in this benchmark, but we can observe that the regular expression engine is using a specific syntax (`/Hello/`).

As for special JavaScript features or syntax, there's no explicit mention of any advanced features like async/await, Promises, or ES6+ syntax.

**Other alternatives**

If you're looking to optimize string inclusion operations, some alternative approaches could include:

* Using the `indexOf()` method instead of `includes()`, as it may be faster in some cases.
* Using a library like Lodash's `includes` function, which is optimized for performance.
* Implementing a custom string search algorithm using bitwise operations or other low-level techniques.

Keep in mind that these alternatives would require additional code and testing to confirm their performance benefits.

I hope this explanation helps you understand the JavaScript microbenchmark being tested on MeasureThat.net!

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/130.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 130 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
regex	5820136.0 Ops/sec
includes	14563225.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Long regex test vs string includes (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: regex vs includes

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

regex

includes

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):