var a = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10];
var b = new Set(a)
return a.includes(1)
return b.has(1)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
includes | |
lookup |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
includes | 47671020.0 Ops/sec |
lookup | 846261888.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for checking if an element exists in an array: using array.includes()
or accessing the first element of the array using array[0]
and then checking with ===
.
Options Compared
Two options are compared:
array.includes()
: This method searches for the specified value in the array, returning a boolean indicating whether it was found.===
).Pros and Cons
array.includes()
:Array.prototype.findIndex()
).Library Used
None is explicitly mentioned in the provided JSON. However, it's worth noting that Set
data structure (used in the "Script Preparation Code") provides an efficient way to check for membership using has()
or includes()
. The difference lies in how these methods are implemented:
Set.prototype.has()
checks if a value is present in the set by iterating over its internal array.Set.prototype.includes()
returns true
if the value is present, and false
otherwise. It's essentially a wrapper around has()
, but might be optimized for certain use cases.Special JS Feature/Syntax
None are explicitly mentioned in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that some modern JavaScript engines and browsers support advanced features like Arrow functions
, which can affect the performance of the benchmark. But this is not relevant to the specific test case being compared here.
Alternative Approaches
Other alternatives for checking if an element exists in an array include:
Array.prototype.findIndex()
or a similar method, which returns the index of the first occurrence of the value (or -1 if not found).findIndex()
function.It's essential to note that the choice of approach depends on the specific use case and performance requirements. The benchmark provided by MeasureThat.net is designed to compare the performance of these different approaches in a controlled environment.