MeasureThat.net
  • Create a benchmark
  • Online Toolsnew
  • About
  • Feedback
  • Buy me a coffeeBuy me a coffee

 convert to set + set.has vs. array.includes (version: 0)

Check if it is faster to convert an array to a set and perform set.has(), compared to performing array.includes() on the base array.

Comparing performance of: includes vs convert to set

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

  • includes

  • convert to set

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    includes
    convert to set

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.
Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics
Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/100.0.4896.88 Safari/537.36
Chrome 100 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Test name Executions per second
includes 12994160.0 Ops/sec
convert to set 1549895.0 Ops/sec