Benchmark: compate splitjoin relaceregrex replaceall

Script Preparation code:

String.prototype.replaceAll1 = function(search, replacement) {
    var target = this;
    return target.replace(new RegExp(search, 'g'), replacement);
};
String.prototype.replaceAll2 = function(search, replacement) {
    var target = this;
    return target.replaceAll(search, replacement);
};

Tests:

replace regrex
"this is it".replace(/ /g, "+");
replace all
"this is it".replaceAll(" ", "+");
split join
"this is it".split(" ").join("+");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
replace regrex
replace all
split join

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Android 10; Mobile; rv:107.0) Gecko/107.0 Firefox/107.0

Browser/OS: Firefox Mobile 107 on Android

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
replace regrex	3246579.0 Ops/sec
replace all	7195226.0 Ops/sec
split join	3665524.0 Ops/sec

compate splitjoin relaceregrex replaceall (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: replace regrex vs replace all vs split join

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

replace regrex

replace all

split join

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A