<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.21/lodash.min.js'></script>
var arrays = [[1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [5, 2, 10]];
console.log(_.difference([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [5, 2, 10]))
console.log(arrays.reduce((a, b) => a.filter(c => !b.includes(c))));
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Lodash | |
Native |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Lodash | 177040.7 Ops/sec |
Native | 190677.1 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and analyze what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark measures the performance of two approaches: using Lodash, a popular JavaScript utility library, versus a native implementation in JavaScript.
Options Compared
Pros and Cons
Library (Lodash)
Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for common tasks. The difference
function, used in the benchmark, is just one example of its many useful features. Lodash's implementation of this function likely uses optimized C++ code to achieve faster execution times.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
None mentioned in the provided benchmark definition.
Other Considerations
Alternatives
Other alternatives for similar tasks might include:
Array.prototype.filter()
method directly, as seen in the native implementation test case.In summary, this benchmark measures the performance difference between using Lodash and a native implementation for array manipulation tasks, highlighting the trade-offs between using an external library versus implementing custom code.