<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
var size = 10000;
_.times(size, index => `$${0 + index}`);
Array.from({length: size}, (_, index) => `$${0 + index}`);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
lodash times | |
array.from |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
lodash times | 19446.0 Ops/sec |
array.from | 3917.2 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the Benchmark Definition and explore what is being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches: using Lodash's times
function and creating an array with Array.from
. The goal is to determine which approach is faster for a specific use case (creating an array of strings).
Lodash times Function
times
function generates an array of values by repeating a provided callback function size
number of times.Array.from Method
length
property).$${0 + index}
, where index
is the current iteration number.Comparison
The two approaches are being compared:
times
function generates an array of strings by calling a callback function for each iteration, whereas the Array.from
method creates an array and then applies the callback function to each element.times
function is likely to be faster because it avoids creating unnecessary arrays or objects.Pros and Cons
times
function:Array.from
.Array.from
method:Other Considerations
ExecutionsPerSecond
metric provides a measure of how many times the code was executed per second, giving an idea of performance.Alternatives
Other approaches to generate an array of strings could be used:
for...of
loop: A simple iterative approach that can be more readable but might not be as efficient as Array.from
.Array.prototype.push
: Adding elements to an existing array is often slower than creating a new array.Keep in mind that the performance difference between these approaches might be negligible for most use cases, and other factors like code readability, maintainability, and scalability should also be considered when choosing an approach.