<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
var arr = new Array(100000000).fill(0);
_.clone(arr);
Array.from(arr)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Lodash clone | |
Array from |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Lodash clone | 0.2 Ops/sec |
Array from | 2.7 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
What is being tested?
The benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches: using the Array.from()
method versus the _.clone()
function from the Lodash library. The test creates an array of 100 million zeros, then performs each operation on it.
Options compared:
Array.from(arr)
: This method creates a new array by iterating over an existing array and creating a new element for each iteration..clone()
from Lodash: This function creates a deep copy of the input value (in this case, the arr
array).Pros and Cons:
Array.from(arr)
:.clone()
from Lodash:Library:
The Lodash library is used for its clone()
function, which creates a deep copy of the input value. This helps ensure that the original array's structure is preserved.
Special JS feature or syntax:
There are no specific JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark.
Other considerations:
This benchmark focuses on the performance difference between these two approaches for creating a shallow copy of an array. It does not test other aspects, such as memory usage or handling edge cases.
Alternatives:
For creating arrays or copies of arrays, alternative methods include:
Array.prototype.slice()
to create a shallow copy....
) to create a new array from an existing one.Keep in mind that the choice of method depends on the specific use case, performance requirements, and desired behavior (e.g., preserving structure vs. efficiency).