Benchmark: Equals vs underscore vs lodash part 2

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.21/lodash.min.js'></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
  window.lodash = _;
  _ = null;
</script>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/underscore.js/1.13.2/underscore-min.js'></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
  window.underscore = _;
  _ = null;
</script>

Script Preparation code:

var str1 ="awesome";
var str2 = "no";

Tests:

underscore
underscore.isEqual(str1, str2);
lodash
lodash.isEqual(str1, str2);
eq
function getType(obj) { return Object.prototype.toString.call(obj).slice(8, -1).toLowerCase(); } if (["object", "array"].includes(getType(str1))) { } else { str1 === str2 }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
underscore
lodash
eq

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:97.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/97.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 97 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
underscore	38365370.0 Ops/sec
lodash	31101270.0 Ops/sec
eq	5994918.0 Ops/sec

Equals vs underscore vs lodash part 2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: underscore vs lodash vs eq

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

underscore

lodash

eq

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A