Benchmark: lodash toInteger vs parseInt

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var str = "123456"

Tests:

lodash
_.toInteger(str);
javascript
parseInt(str);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
lodash
javascript

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one month ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:135.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/135.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 135 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
lodash	10475470.0 Ops/sec
javascript	2500396288.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 6 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll break down the explanation of the provided benchmark definition, test cases, and results.

**Benchmark Definition:**

The benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches to convert a string to an integer:

1. `_.toInteger(str);` using Lodash's `toInteger` function
2. `parseInt(str);`

**Options compared:**

These two options are compared in terms of their execution speed. The benchmark aims to determine which approach is faster for converting a given string.

**Pros and Cons:**

* **Lodash's `toInteger` function:**
	+ Pros:
		- Uses a specialized integer conversion algorithm that might be optimized for performance.
		- Can handle edge cases, such as NaN or non-numeric input, more robustly.
	+ Cons:
		- Requires an additional dependency (the Lodash library) to be included in the test environment.
		- May introduce extra overhead due to the library's initialization and other dependencies.
* **`parseInt(str);`:**
	+ Pros:
		- Is a built-in JavaScript function, so no additional dependencies are required.
		- Might be optimized by the JavaScript engine for performance.
	+ Cons:
		- May not handle edge cases as robustly as Lodash's `toInteger`.
		- Can be slower due to parsing and validation overhead.

**Library:**

The `lodash` library is used in this benchmark. Its purpose is to provide a collection of small, reusable functions for tasks such as string manipulation, array operations, and more. In this case, the `toInteger` function is used to convert a string to an integer.

**Special JS feature/syntax:**

None mentioned explicitly. However, it's worth noting that JavaScript engines often use various optimizations and techniques under the hood to improve performance. These may include:

* Just-In-Time (JIT) compilation
* Cache optimization
* Loop unrolling
* Dead code elimination

These optimizations can affect the performance of built-in functions like `parseInt` but are not directly related to the benchmark.

**Other alternatives:**

If you wanted to compare other integer conversion approaches, some alternatives could be:

* Using a switch statement or a lookup table for manual string-to-integer conversion.
* Utilizing specialized libraries or frameworks that provide optimized integer conversion implementations (e.g., `numjs`).
* Implementing your own custom integer conversion algorithm tailored to the specific requirements of the benchmark.

Keep in mind that each alternative approach would require modifications to the benchmark definition and test cases.

Related benchmarks:

lodash toInteger vs parseInt (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: lodash vs javascript

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

lodash

javascript

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 6 months ago):