<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
var str = "123456"
_.parseInt(str);
parseInt(str);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
lodash | |
javascript |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
lodash | 6365613.0 Ops/sec |
javascript | 818580800.0 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the benchmark explanation in a way that's easy to understand for software engineers of all levels.
Benchmark Overview
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test case, which compares the performance of two approaches: using the built-in parseInt()
function and using the _.parseInt()
function from the Lodash library.
Options Compared
Two options are compared:
parseInt()
: This is the built-in function in JavaScript that converts a string to an integer._.parseInt()
: This is a utility function from the popular Lodash library, which provides various functions for common tasks.Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
parseInt()
:_.parseInt()
:Other Considerations
When choosing between these approaches, consider the specific requirements of your project:
parseInt()
might be sufficient._.parseInt()
is a better choice.Library: Lodash
Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a collection of functions for common tasks. In this benchmark, the _.parseInt()
function is used to compare with the built-in parseInt()
function from JavaScript.
Special JS Features or Syntax
This benchmark doesn't rely on any special JavaScript features or syntax. The code is straightforward and relies solely on the two functions being compared.
Alternative Approaches
Other alternatives for comparing integer parsing performance might include:
Number.parseInt()
from ECMAScript 2015).Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on your specific requirements and project constraints.