var list = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 1000 * 1000; i++) {
list.push(i);
}
idx = 0;
list.push('slice');
list = list.slice(1);
list.push('splice');
list.splice(0, 1);
list.push('splice');
list.shift();
list[idx] = 'splice';
idx = (idx++) % list.length;
// Needs some formatting when you actually need to use the list
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
slice | |
splice | |
shift | |
indexed |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
slice | 130.4 Ops/sec |
splice | 5490.6 Ops/sec |
shift | 745.7 Ops/sec |
indexed | 934829.8 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what is being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark definition is a JSON object that describes how to create a microbenchmark. In this case, it consists of three parts:
list
with 1 million elements using a for
loop. The variable idx
is also initialized.The script performs three different operations on the list
array:
splice
: Removes the first element from the list using splice
.shift
: Removes the first element from the list using shift
.slice
: Creates a new slice of the list, excluding the first element, and assigns it back to the original list.Test Cases
The test cases are individual JavaScript code snippets that perform these operations on the list
array. Each test case has a unique name (e.g., "splice", "shift", etc.).
Here's what each operation does:
splice(0, 1)
.shift()
.Library Used
None of the provided test cases use any external libraries. The benchmarking script only relies on built-in JavaScript methods.
Special JS Features or Syntax
The slice
method uses a new operator (new
) in its implementation, which is not explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition. This is because some browsers may have different implementations for this method.
Pros and Cons of Different Approaches
Each operation has its pros and cons:
Alternative Approaches
Some alternative approaches could have been used:
splice
, you could use array.filter()
or array.map()
to create a new array with the same elements, excluding the first one.array.pop()
or array.splice(1, 0)
(which is less common).slice
as a method call instead of the new operator (new slice()
) might be more browser-friendly.Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and trade-offs compared to the original implementation.