var list = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 1000 * 1000; i++) {
list.push(i);
}
list = [];
list.length = 0;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
array = [] | |
array.length = 0; |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
array = [] | 5326363.5 Ops/sec |
array.length = 0; | 5502964.5 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain what's being tested in the provided benchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for clearing an array: using array = []
or array.length = 0
. The goal is to determine which approach is faster and more efficient.
Options Compared
There are only two options compared:
array = []
to create a new empty array.array.length = 0
to set the length of an existing array to 0, effectively clearing it.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Array Assignment (e.g., array = []
)
Pros:
Cons:
Array Property Access (e.g., array.length = 0
)
Pros:
Cons:
Other Considerations
The benchmark likely uses a JavaScript engine that has a relatively fast garbage collector, as evidenced by the high number of executions per second (e.g., 5.5M and 5.3M for each test case). This suggests that the majority of the overhead is due to the array creation process rather than garbage collection.
Library or Framework
The benchmark does not appear to use any external libraries or frameworks, so it's likely a simple implementation of the two approaches being compared.
Special JavaScript Features or Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark. The code uses standard JavaScript language features and syntax.
Alternative Approaches
Other possible ways to clear an array might include:
array.splice(0, 0)
to remove all elements from the array.for (var i = 0; i < array.length; i++) { array[i] = undefined; }
).However, these alternatives are not being tested in this benchmark.