var list = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {
list.push ({ timestamp: Math.round (+new Date() / 1000) });
}
var list2 = list.slice (0, 101)
list.splice(101)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
slice | |
splice |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
slice | 5113900.0 Ops/sec |
splice | 7220007.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares two approaches for truncating an array in JavaScript: using Array.prototype.slice()
versus Array.prototype.splice()
. The test creates a large array of 1,000,000 objects and then attempts to slice or splice it at different points.
Options Compared
There are two options being compared:
slice()
: This method returns a shallow copy of the original array, truncated to the specified length.splice()
: This method modifies the original array by removing elements from the end and returning an array of removed elements. In this case, we're trying to remove 101 elements.Pros and Cons
slice()
:splice()
:slice()
, especially when dealing with large arrays.Library Used
There is no specific library mentioned in this benchmark. Both Array.prototype.slice()
and Array.prototype.splice()
are built-in JavaScript methods.
Special JS Feature/ Syntax
None of the code uses any special JavaScript features or syntax that's not widely supported.
Other Alternatives
If you were to optimize your array truncation using a different approach, some alternatives could be:
Array.prototype.filter()
to create a new array with only the desired elements.Array.prototype.reduce()
and slicing the resulting array.However, it's worth noting that these alternatives might not be as straightforward or efficient as using slice()
or splice()
, depending on the specific use case and performance requirements.
In summary, this benchmark is testing the performance of two common JavaScript methods for array truncation: Array.prototype.slice()
and Array.prototype.splice()
.