Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.

Benchmark Definition

The provided JSON defines a benchmark named "Rest parameters vs array parameter with empty parameters". This benchmark tests two different approaches to handling rest parameters (the dots ... in function arguments) versus using an array as a parameter.

Options Compared

Two options are compared:

1. Rest Parameters: Using the syntax fr = (a, ...b) => a.concat(b.map(String)). This approach uses the rest parameter syntax to capture any additional arguments passed to the function.
2. Array Parameter with Empty Parameters: Using the syntax fa = (a, b) => a.concat(b.map(String)) and calling it with an array [0], which represents an empty set of parameters.

Pros and Cons

• Rest Parameters:
  • Pros: More concise and expressive way to handle variable-length function arguments.
  • Cons: May have performance implications due to the need for map() on the rest parameter, which can be slower than using a traditional array.
• Array Parameter with Empty Parameters:
  • Pros: Can provide a more predictable performance profile, as the number of operations is fixed.
  • Cons: Less concise and less expressive than rest parameters.

Library

The benchmark uses the String function to concatenate strings. This is likely due to the fact that JavaScript's built-in string concatenation operator (+) has some issues with Unicode characters, whereas String() ensures a consistent behavior across different platforms.

Special JS Feature/Syntax

This benchmark does not use any special or experimental JavaScript features. It only uses standard language syntax and built-in functions.

Other Alternatives

If you're looking for alternative approaches to handling rest parameters, you could consider:

• Using apply() or call() to pass an array of arguments to a function.
• Implementing your own custom rest parameter parser.
• Using a library like restify that provides a more robust and expressive way to handle rest parameters.

Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on your specific use case, performance requirements, and personal preference.