const f = (a, b) => a.concat(b.map(String))
const r = f([0], 1, 2, 3, 4, 5);
const f = (a, b) => a.concat(b.map(String))
const r = f([0], [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Rest | |
Array |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Rest | 12974438.0 Ops/sec |
Array | 13406819.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks.
What is tested?
The provided benchmark tests two approaches to passing multiple arguments to a function: using rest parameters (e.g., ...b
) and using an array as a parameter (e.g., [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
).
Options compared
Two options are being compared:
...
syntax to capture all remaining arguments into an array-like object called the "rest" parameter.Pros and Cons of each approach
Rest Parameters:
Pros:
concat
or array manipulationCons:
Array Parameter:
Pros:
Cons:
Library usage
There doesn't appear to be any libraries being used in this benchmark.
Special JS features or syntax
The map
function is used to transform each element in the array, which is a common pattern in JavaScript. The String
function is used as the mapping function, but it's not relevant to the rest parameters vs. array parameter comparison.
Benchmark preparation code and HTML Preparation Code
The provided benchmark definition includes script preparation code that defines two functions: f
with rest parameters and f
with an array parameter. There is no corresponding HTML preparation code.
Other alternatives
There are a few other ways to pass multiple arguments to a function in JavaScript:
...
): This can be used in combination with the rest parameter syntax or as an alternative to using arrays.arguments
: This is an array-like object that contains all arguments passed to the function.Overall, the provided benchmark tests the performance difference between two approaches to passing multiple arguments to a JavaScript function.