<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.6.0.min.js"></script>
const arr1 = [ true, 1, "true", [], {}, function () {} ];
const arr2 = $.extend(arr1);
const arr1 = [ true, 1, "true", [], {}, function () {} ];
const arr2 = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(arr1));
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
jQuery.extend | |
JSON.stringify |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
jQuery.extend | 3856981.2 Ops/sec |
JSON.stringify | 3172130.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for merging data: jQuery.extend() and JSON.parse(JSON.stringify()). The goal is to determine which approach is faster.
Options Compared
There are only two options compared in this benchmark:
Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
Library Used
The $.extend()
method is part of the jQuery library, which provides a convenient way to merge objects. The JSON.parse()
and JSON.stringify()
methods are part of the JavaScript Standard Library, but in this context, they're used together to perform an additional parsing step.
Special JS Features or Syntax
None mentioned in the provided benchmark definition.
Benchmark Preparation Code
The preparation code includes a script tag that loads the jQuery library version 3.6.0. This is necessary for the benchmark to work correctly with the $.extend()
method.
Alternative Approaches
Some alternative approaches for merging data could be:
{ ...obj1, ...obj2 }
)Object.assign()
methodHowever, these alternatives are not being tested in this benchmark.
In summary, the benchmark is designed to compare two approaches for merging data: jQuery.extend() and JSON.parse(JSON.stringify()). The pros and cons of each approach have been discussed, along with an explanation of the libraries used.