var array = new Array(100);
for (var i = 0, n = array.length; i < n; i++) {
array[i];
}
for (var i of array) {
array[i];
}
for (var i in array) {
array[i];
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
for | |
for..of | |
for..in |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
for | 270285.9 Ops/sec |
for..of | 231373.0 Ops/sec |
for..in | 5787572.5 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the benchmark and its results to help explain what's being tested, compared, and considered.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of three different loop constructs in JavaScript: for
, for..of
, and some
. The goal is to determine which loop construct is the fastest for accessing elements in an array.
Loop Constructs Compared
for
: This loop uses a traditional for
loop with an index variable (i
) that increments manually.for..of
: This loop uses the new for...of
loop syntax, which automatically iterates over the elements of an array or other iterable using an iterator object.some
: This loop uses the some()
method, which returns a boolean value indicating whether at least one element in the array satisfies a given condition.Pros and Cons
for
: Pros: simple, well-known syntax. Cons: requires manual indexing and looping.for..of
: Pros: concise, easy to read, and efficient. Cons: requires knowledge of new loop syntax.some
: Pros: can be used for more complex conditions or filtering. Cons: not designed specifically for iterating over arrays; may incur additional overhead.Library Usage
None of the loops use any external libraries in this benchmark.
Special JavaScript Features/Syntax
The for..of
loop uses a new feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6), which allows iterating over array elements using an iterator object. This syntax is designed to simplify iteration over arrays and other iterables, making it more concise and expressive than traditional loops.
Benchmark Results
The latest benchmark results show that the for..of
loop outperforms both the for
and some
loops in terms of execution speed (measured in executions per second). This suggests that using the for...of
loop syntax can lead to faster performance when iterating over arrays.
Other Alternatives
If you prefer a different approach, consider these alternatives:
forEach()
method: While not exactly equivalent to the for
loop, the forEach()
method provides a concise way to iterate over an array using a callback function.while
loop: Another traditional looping construct that can be used for iteration.map()
, filter()
, or reduce()
methods: These methods provide alternative ways to process arrays by applying transformations, filtering, or aggregating values.Keep in mind that the choice of loop construct depends on your specific use case and personal preference. The for...of
loop syntax has gained popularity due to its conciseness and readability, but traditional loops can still be useful in certain situations.