const obj = {a: { e: { i: 6 } } };
const i = obj.a.e.i;
console.log(i);
const obj = {a: { e: { i: 6 } } };
const { a: { e: { i} } } = obj;
console.log(i);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Assign | |
Destructure |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Assign | 361427.0 Ops/sec |
Destructure | 360837.6 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the explanation of what is being tested on MeasureThat.net.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to compare two approaches: assigning a value to a variable (Assign
) and destructuring an object using shorthand syntax (Destructure
). The benchmark is focused on measuring the performance difference between these two methods in JavaScript.
Options Compared
There are only two options being compared:
6
directly to a variable, e.g., const i = 6;
.{a: { e: { i} }}
to extract the value i
from an object.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Library and Purpose
There is no library used in this benchmark. The performance difference is being measured directly between the two approaches.
Special JavaScript Feature or Syntax
The benchmark uses destructuring assignment, which is a feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It allows for concise object property extraction using syntax like {a: { e: { i} }}
.
Other Considerations
To ensure accurate results, the benchmark likely considers factors such as:
Alternatives
If you're looking to explore similar benchmarks or test other JavaScript performance scenarios, you might consider MeasureThat.net's existing benchmarks, which cover a wide range of topics, including:
forEach
, map
, filter
)Additionally, you can explore other online benchmarking tools, such as:
benchmark
or test-ify
These alternatives offer a range of features, including more extensive benchmarking capabilities, customization options, and support for additional JavaScript versions.