var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
var other = params.slice();
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]
var other = [ params ]
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]
var other = params.concat()
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.slice | |
spread operator | |
concat |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.slice | 107526488.0 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 59105820.0 Ops/sec |
concat | 71339184.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and its components.
Benchmark Definition
The provided JSON represents a benchmarking test for comparing three approaches to create a shallow copy of an array:
Array.prototype.slice()
[ ...params ]
)concat()
method (params.concat()
)These approaches are used to compare their performance, which is likely the primary purpose of this benchmark.
Options Compared
The three options being compared have different characteristics:
Array.prototype.slice()
: This method creates a shallow copy of an array by returning a new array object with references to the original elements. It's a widely supported and well-established method.[ ...params ]
): Introduced in ES6, this operator allows for creating arrays from iterable objects (like arrays or strings). In this benchmark, it's used to create a shallow copy of an array by spreading its elements into a new array.concat()
method: This method creates a new array object and then copies the elements from the original array into the new one. It's also widely supported but can be slower than slice()
due to its extra step.Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons for each approach:
Array.prototype.slice()
[ ...params ]
)slice()
due to its creation of a new array object. Introduced in ES6, so older browsers may not support it.concat()
methodslice()
, and has an extra step of creating a new array object.Library Usage
There is no library usage in this benchmark, as all three approaches are native JavaScript methods.
Special JS Features or Syntax
The spread operator ([ ...params ]
) uses a feature introduced in ES6, which allows for creating arrays from iterable objects. This might be unfamiliar to some developers, but it's a common and useful syntax in modern JavaScript.
Other Alternatives
If you're looking for alternative approaches, consider:
Array.prototype.reduce()
: Although not directly applicable here, reduce()
can be used to create an array by accumulating elements from the original array.In summary, the benchmark compares three approaches to create a shallow copy of an array: Array.prototype.slice()
, spread operator ([ ...params ]
), and traditional concat()
method. Each has its pros and cons, with slice()
being fast and widely supported, while the spread operator is concise but may be slower.