var a1 = [1,2,3,4];
var a2 = a1.concat('bar');
var a1 = [1,2,3,4];
var a2 = [a1, 'bar'];
var a1 = [1,2,3,4];
var a2 = a1.push('bar');
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | |
Spread Operator | |
Array.prototype.push |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | 4314433.5 Ops/sec |
Spread Operator | 3571932.5 Ops/sec |
Array.prototype.push | 41654092.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition JSON
The benchmark definition JSON contains information about the three test cases:
Array concat vs spread operator vs push (without spread)
: This is the overall name of the benchmark, which describes the three test cases.Script Preparation Code
and Html Preparation Code
: These fields are empty, indicating that no custom script or HTML preparation code is required for this benchmark.Individual Test Cases
There are three individual test cases:
var a1 = [1,2,3,4];\r\nvar a2 = a1.concat('bar');
concat()
method.var a1 = [1,2,3,4];\r\nvar a2 = [...a1, 'bar'];
...
) to concatenate an array with a string.var a1 = [1,2,3,4];\r\nvar a2 = a1.push('bar');
push()
method.Library Usage
None of these test cases use any external libraries.
Special JS Features or Syntax
The test cases do not rely on any special JavaScript features or syntax, such as async/await, promises, or es6 classes. They only use basic JavaScript features like arrays and methods.
Options Compared
The three test cases compare the performance of different ways to concatenate an array with a string:
Array.prototype.concat()
...
)Array.prototype.push()
These methods have different approaches and implications for performance:
concat()
method creates a new array and concatenates the original array with the provided string. This can be expensive because it involves creating a new object....
) uses a clever trick to concatenate arrays without creating a new object. It copies the elements from the original array into a new array, leaving out the element that is being spread into the new array. This approach is generally faster but might incur additional memory overhead.Array.prototype.push()
method modifies the existing array by adding a new element at the end. This can be slower than concatenating an array because it involves updating the internal state of the array.Pros and Cons
Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons for each approach:
concat()
: Creates a new array, which can lead to memory overhead and slower performance....
): Copies elements from the original array into a new array, leaving out the element being spread. This approach avoids creating unnecessary objects but may incur additional memory overhead.concat()
, reduces memory usage.Array.prototype.push()
: Modifies the existing array by adding a new element at the end. This can lead to slower performance because it involves updating the internal state of the array.Other Alternatives
Other alternatives for concatenating arrays or strings could be explored:
Array.prototype.join()
: Concatenates an array into a string using the join()
method. This approach is specific to arrays and might not be as performant as other methods.However, these alternatives are likely to incur additional overhead or may not provide a clear performance advantage over the existing approaches.