Benchmark: Test-avi - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

var arr = Array.from({ length: 1000 }, (_, i) => ({
    label: `Value ${i + 1}`,
    id: i + 1
  }));

Tests:

find
arr.find(item => item.id === 500)
some
arr.some(item => item.id === 500)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
find
some

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and its test cases.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition is a JSON object that represents the script to be executed on the MeasureThat.net platform. The script preparation code creates an array of 1000 objects, each with a unique `id` property, using the `Array.from()` method. This array will serve as the input data for the tests.

**Options Compared**

The benchmark compares two different methods:

1. `find(item => item.id === 500)`: This is a method that finds an element in the array where the `id` property matches the specified value.
2. `some(item => item.id === 500)`: This is a method that checks if at least one element in the array meets the condition.

**Pros and Cons**

* **find()**: Pros:
	+ Returns the first matching element, which can be useful for simple lookup scenarios.
	+ Can be more efficient than `some()` when only one match is expected.
Cons:
	+ May return null if no match is found, which can lead to errors in some applications.
	+ Requires the implementation to handle this edge case.
* **some()**: Pros:
	+ Returns a boolean value indicating whether at least one element matches the condition.
	+ Does not require handling edge cases like null returns.
Cons:
	+ May return true if no elements match, which can lead to unexpected behavior in some applications.

In general, `find()` is more suitable when you expect exactly one matching element, while `some()` is better suited for scenarios where you want to check if at least one element meets the condition. However, the choice ultimately depends on the specific requirements of your application and the characteristics of your data.

**Library and Purpose**

There are no libraries used in this benchmark. The scripts only utilize built-in JavaScript methods and functionality.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark beyond what's described above. No ES6+ features, closures, async/await, etc., are utilized.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches for similar benchmarks, consider the following options:

1. **Looping through the array**: Instead of using `find()` or `some()`, you could loop through the array and check each element individually.
2. **Using a library like Lodash**: If you need more advanced functionality, such as memoization or caching, a library like Lodash might be suitable.
3. **Testing with a different data structure**: Experimenting with different data structures, like linked lists or trees, can provide valuable insights into performance differences.

By understanding the test cases and options compared in this benchmark, you'll gain insight into how to approach similar testing scenarios in your own projects.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_2) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/85.0.4183.102 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 85 on Mac OS X 10.15.2

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
find	1244341.9 Ops/sec
some	1491389.4 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Test-avi (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: find vs some

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

find

some

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):