var arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20];
var res = arr.slice(0)[0];
var res = arr[0];
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
slice | |
index |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
slice | 2417749.0 Ops/sec |
index | 2720183.8 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested, compared, and some pros and cons of each approach.
Benchmark Definition
The Script Preparation Code
defines an array arr
with 20 elements from 1 to 20. This array is used as input for two different benchmark tests: "slice" and "index".
Test Cases
There are two test cases:
slice()
method to extract the first element (0
) from the array arr
. The code: var res = arr.slice(0)[0];
.arr[0]
) to access the first element of the array arr
.Options Compared
In this case, we have two approaches being compared:
slice()
method with a start index of 0.Pros and Cons
In general, direct indexing is usually preferred when dealing with small arrays or performance-critical code. However, for larger arrays or when readability and maintainability are more important than micro-optimizations, using slice()
can be a better choice.
Library Usage
There isn't any explicit library usage in these benchmark definitions. However, it's worth noting that the Array.prototype.slice()
method is part of the ECMAScript standard and is widely supported across browsers.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
None of the provided benchmark definitions use special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's part of the ECMAScript standard. If you were to add additional complexity, you might consider using ES6+ features like const
, let
variables, arrow functions, or template literals.
Alternatives
For running microbenchmarks like this one, some alternative tools and frameworks are:
These alternatives can provide more features, customization options, and integration with various frameworks or libraries.