Benchmark: set.has vs. array.includes vs array.indexOf (numeric values)

Script Preparation code:

var a = [
  8123075259360718,
  2180349503224798,
  6686356311324193,
  362184468266422,
  2306757200330954,
  4532178674851796,
  8970950942018765
];
var b = new Set(a)

Tests:

includes
return a.includes(8123075259360718) ^ a.includes(7516472072139877) ^ a.includes(362184468266422);
lookup
return b.has(8123075259360718) ^ b.has(7516472072139877) ^ b.has(362184468266422);
indexof
return (a.indexOf(8123075259360718) > -1) ^ (a.indexOf(7516472072139877) > -1) ^ (a.indexOf(362184468266422) > -1);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
includes
lookup
indexof

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:103.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/103.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 103 on Mac OS X 10.15

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
includes	10296810.0 Ops/sec
lookup	1561226000.0 Ops/sec
indexof	10627020.0 Ops/sec

set.has vs. array.includes vs array.indexOf (numeric values) (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: includes vs lookup vs indexof

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

includes

lookup

indexof

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A