(function () {
var arr = [55, 21, 807, 41, 56, 66, 202];
var num = 4;
var str = "Lorem ipsum";
var bool = true;
var nil = null;
console.log(arr, num, str, bool, nil);
})();
(function () {
let arr = [55, 21, 807, 41, 56, 66, 202];
let num = 4;
let str = "Lorem ipsum";
let bool = true;
let nil = null;
console.log(arr, num, str, bool, nil);
})();
(function () {
const arr = [55, 21, 807, 41, 56, 66, 202];
const num = 4;
const str = "Lorem ipsum";
const bool = true;
const nil = null;
console.log(arr, num, str, bool, nil);
})();
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
var | |
let | |
const |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
var | 104804.0 Ops/sec |
let | 102573.1 Ops/sec |
const | 101666.7 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros/cons of different approaches.
Benchmark Definition:
The benchmark is testing the performance difference between three JavaScript variable declarations: var
, let
, and const
.
Script Preparation Code:
The script preparation code is empty, which means that the test case only runs a simple JavaScript snippet. In this case, the snippet creates an array arr
with some values, declares four variables (num
, str
, bool
, and nil
) and logs their values to the console using console.log
.
Individual Test Cases:
There are three test cases:
var
let
const
Each test case has the same script preparation code, but with a different variable declaration.
What's Being Tested?
The benchmark is testing the performance difference between the three variable declarations in terms of execution time. The test case measures how many times the JavaScript engine can execute the script for each variable declaration per second.
Comparison:
Here's a brief comparison of var
, let
, and const
:
var
: In older versions of JavaScript, var
declared variables that were "hoisted" to the top of their scope. This meant that even though the variable was assigned a value later in the code, it could be accessed before its assignment. var
is now considered legacy syntax and should not be used for new code.let
: Introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6), let
declared block-scoped variables that were not hoisted like var
. This means that a variable could only be accessed after it was declared. let
is now the recommended way to declare variables in modern JavaScript.const
: Also introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6), const
declared constants that also could not be hoisted like var
. Unlike let
, const
cannot be reassigned once it's set.Pros and Cons:
Here are some pros and cons of each variable declaration:
var
:let
: This is now the recommended way to declare variables in modern JavaScript. It's not hoisted, so you need to access a variable after it's declared.var
because it doesn't get optimized like hoisted var
.const
: This is also not hoisted. It's the recommended way to declare constants in modern JavaScript.Other Considerations:
var
, the JavaScript engine allocates memory for the variable right away, even if it's not initialized. With let
and const
, the memory is allocated when the variable is actually assigned a value.var
variables better than let
and const
. However, since let
and const
are now the recommended way to declare variables in modern JavaScript, it's a good idea to use them for most cases.var
, it has function scope, meaning it can be accessed from anywhere within the function where it's declared. With let
and const
, variables have block scope, which means they're only accessible within the block where they're declared.Alternative Options:
Here are some alternative options to test:
forEach
, map
, and reduce
.These alternatives can provide additional insights into the performance characteristics of various JavaScript features.
In summary, the benchmark is testing the performance difference between three variable declarations (var
, let
, and const
) in terms of execution time. The results show that let
is generally faster than var
, while const
is slightly slower due to its reassignment prevention mechanism.