Benchmark: var vs const vs let

Tests:

var
var g = 1; var c = g + 1;
let
let g = 1; let c = g + 1;
const
const g = 1; const c = g + 1;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
var
let
const

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Sumamry (model llama3.2:3b, generated 3 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test case on the MeasureThat.net website. The benchmark compares the performance of three JavaScript variable declarations: `var`, `const`, and `let`.

**Variable Declaration Options**

1. **`var`**: The traditional JavaScript variable declaration, which declares a variable that can be reassigned.
	* Pros:
		+ Wide support across older browsers.
	* Cons:
		+ Can lead to performance issues due to hoisting and reassignment.
2. **`const`**: A more modern JavaScript variable declaration, which declares a constant that cannot be reassigned after initialization.
	* Pros:
		+ Improved code readability and maintainability.
		+ Better performance compared to `var`.
3. **`let`**: Another modern JavaScript variable declaration, which declares a block-scoped variable that can be reassigned.
	* Pros:
		+ Similar syntax to `const`, making it easier to read and write code.
		+ Good performance.

**Comparison**

The benchmark compares the execution times of each variable declaration option in a simple assignment scenario:

```javascript
var g = 1;
var c = g + 1;
```

The test cases also include variants with `let` and `const`, which can help identify performance differences between these options.

**Library Usage**

None of the test cases use any JavaScript libraries. The benchmark focuses solely on comparing the native variable declaration options.

**Special JS Features or Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark.

**Other Alternatives**

If you wanted to compare other JavaScript variable declaration options, such as:

* **`let const`**: A more modern alternative to `var`, which combines the benefits of `const` and `let`.
* **`class-based variables`**: Some newer JavaScript engines support class-based variables, which can provide better scoping and memory management.

However, these alternatives are not currently supported by MeasureThat.net.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 8 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 16_1_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/16.1 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1

Browser/OS: Mobile Safari 16 on iOS 16.1.1

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
var	679251800.0 Ops/sec
let	660751600.0 Ops/sec
const	670001300.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

var vs const vs let (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: var vs let vs const

Created: 8 months ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

var

let

const

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Sumamry (model llama3.2:3b, generated 3 days ago):