Benchmark: testtesttest - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

var obj = {
	maxRows: 1
}
var getSettings = function() {
	return obj;
}

Tests:

get by method
Math.min(10, getSettings().maxRows);
get by method with cache
var cached = getSettings().maxRows Math.min(10, cached);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
get by method
get by method with cache

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'd be happy to help explain what's being tested in the provided benchmark.

**What is being tested?**

The benchmark is testing two different approaches to retrieving a value from an object: using a function (`getSettings`) and using a cached property of that object. The test cases are comparing the performance of these two approaches.

**Options compared**

There are two options being compared:

1. **Using a function**: `Math.min(10, getSettings().maxRows);`
2. **Using a cached property**: `var cached = getSettings().maxRows; Math.min(10, cached);`

**Pros and Cons of each approach:**

* Using a function:
	+ Pros: More explicit and readable code, can be useful when the value needs to be calculated or transformed.
	+ Cons: Can be slower due to the function call overhead, may require additional computations.
* Using a cached property:
	+ Pros: Faster execution since it directly accesses the object's property without the function call overhead.
	+ Cons: May lead to stale data if the property is not updated frequently, and can make the code less readable.

**Library used**

In this benchmark, no specific JavaScript library is used. The `getSettings` function is defined as a simple getter function that returns an object with a single property `maxRows`.

**Special JS features or syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in this benchmark.

**Other considerations:**

* This benchmark assumes that the `getSettings` function and the `maxRows` property are already defined in the surrounding script.
* The test cases only compare the performance of these two approaches, without considering other factors such as code readability, maintainability, or scalability.

**Alternatives:**

There are other ways to optimize this benchmark, such as:

* Using a more efficient data structure (e.g., an array instead of an object) for storing the `maxRows` value.
* Implementing memoization or caching mechanisms to store and reuse computed values.
* Using a different JavaScript engine or version that may provide better performance optimizations.

Note that these alternatives would require modifying the benchmark script or using additional libraries, which are not shown in the provided code snippet.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 7 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_12_1) AppleWebKit/602.2.14 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/10.0.1 Safari/602.2.14

Browser/OS: Safari 10 on Mac OS X 10.12.1

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
get by method	3169053.8 Ops/sec
get by method with cache	3207467.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

testtesttest (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: get by method vs get by method with cache

Created: 7 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

get by method

get by method with cache

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):