Benchmark: Native vs Lodash vs Lodash FP

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/g/lodash@4(lodash.min.js+lodash.fp.min.js)'></script>
var fp = _.noConflict();

Script Preparation code:

var fp = _.noConflict();
var array =  ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h', 'i', 'j', 'k', 'l', 'm', 'n', 'o', 'p', 'q', 'r', 's', 't', 'u', 'v', 'w', 'x', 'y', 'z'];
var reducer = (r, x) => r + x;

Tests:

Native
array.reduce(reducer, '');
Lodash
_.reduce(array, reducer, '');
Lodash FP
fp.reduce(reducer, '', array);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Native
Lodash
Lodash FP

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:101.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/101.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 101 on Mac OS X 10.15

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Native	5046795.0 Ops/sec
Lodash	3730403.0 Ops/sec
Lodash FP	2001136.0 Ops/sec

Native vs Lodash vs Lodash FP (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Native vs Lodash vs Lodash FP

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Native

Lodash

Lodash FP

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A