Benchmark: Lodash vs Lodash FP vs Native

HTML Preparation code:

<script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/lodash/4.17.4/lodash.fp.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var fp = _.noConflict();
var array =  ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h', 'i', 'j', 'k', 'l', 'm', 'n', 'o', 'p', 'q', 'r', 's', 't', 'u', 'v', 'w', 'x', 'y', 'z']
var reducer = (r, x) => r + x

Tests:

Lodash FP
fp.reduce(reducer, '')(array)
Native
array.reduce(reducer, '')
Lodash Regular
_.reduce(array, reducer, '');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash FP
Native
Lodash Regular

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 12; M2102K1C) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/106.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome Mobile 106 on Android

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Lodash FP	570746.0 Ops/sec
Native	1188287.0 Ops/sec
Lodash Regular	932135.9 Ops/sec

Lodash vs Lodash FP vs Native (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Lodash FP vs Native vs Lodash Regular

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Lodash FP

Native

Lodash Regular

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A