function escapeRegExp(string) {
return string.replace(/[.*+\-?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\$&'); // $& means the whole matched string
}
function replaceAll(str, find, replace) {
return str.replace(new RegExp(escapeRegExp(find), 'g'), replace);
}
str = "Test abc test test abc test...Test abc test test abc test...Test abc test test abc test...Test abc test test abc test...Test abc test test abc test..."
str.split("abc").join("def")
replaceAll(str, 'abc', 'def')
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
split and join | |
regex replace |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
split and join | 1562308.6 Ops/sec |
regex replace | 608301.6 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
Benchmark Definition JSON
The provided Benchmark Definition JSON represents two test cases:
string replaceAll test
: This benchmark measures the performance of a custom replaceAll
function, which replaces all occurrences of a specified string (find
) with another string (replace
) in a given input string (str
). The input string is created using a regular expression to escape special characters.split and join
: This benchmark measures the performance of the split
method followed by the join
method, which splits a string into an array of substrings based on a specified separator and then joins them back into a single string using another separator.regex replace
: This benchmark measures the performance of a built-in regular expression replacement function (replaceAll
is not used here), which replaces all occurrences of a specified pattern with a new string in a given input string.Comparison Options
The two test cases use different approaches to measure performance:
replaceAll
function: The first test case uses a custom implementation of the replaceAll
function, which might be optimized for specific use cases or requirements. This approach allows for more control over the replacement process but may introduce additional overhead due to the custom implementation.split
and join
methods: The second test case uses the built-in split
and join
methods, which are part of the JavaScript language and optimized for performance.Pros and Cons
Custom replaceAll
function:
Pros:
Cons:
Built-in split
and join
methods:
Pros:
Cons:
Library Usage
The replaceAll
function uses a library (regular expressions) to escape special characters and create a pattern for matching. This is a standard JavaScript feature and does not require any additional libraries.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
None mentioned.
Other Considerations
When interpreting benchmark results, consider the following:
Alternative Benchmarks
To test similar scenarios, consider using alternative benchmarks:
String.prototype.replace()
instead of a custom implementation.String.prototype.indexOf()
and String.prototype.substring()
.Keep in mind that the specific benchmark options will depend on your requirements and goals.