var times = [];
performance.now()
Date.now()
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
performance.now | |
Date.now |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
performance.now | 2088262.4 Ops/sec |
Date.now | 3370960.2 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks.
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents two benchmark definitions: Date.now()
and performance.now()
. These are both methods used to measure time in JavaScript, but they have different origins and usage patterns.
Date.now()
returns the number of milliseconds since January 1, 1970, 00:00:00 UTC. This method is part of the built-in Date
object and is often used for simple timing measurements.
performance.now()
, on the other hand, returns the value (in fractional seconds) of a performance counter, which is a timestamp that represents a continuous, monotonically increasing value. This method is specifically designed to measure short periods of time and is more suitable for measuring frame rates or response times in interactive applications.
Options compared
The two benchmark definitions are being tested against each other, with Date.now()
serving as the "baseline" or "manual" timing measurement, while performance.now()
uses the browser's performance counter to measure time. This comparison allows users to see which method is more accurate and reliable for their specific use case.
Pros and Cons
Manual Timing (Date.now()): Pros:
Performance Counter (performance.now()): Pros:
performance
APILibrary usage
There is no explicit library mentioned in the provided JSON. However, if you're using a modern JavaScript framework like React or Angular, you might be relying on libraries like react-dom
or angular/core
that provide implementation details for these timing measurements.
Special JS feature/syntax
There are no special JS features or syntax mentioned in the provided information. Both Date.now()
and performance.now()
are standard JavaScript methods.
Alternatives
If you need to measure time in JavaScript, here are some alternative approaches:
Keep in mind that the choice of measurement method depends on your specific use case and the requirements of your project.