var timestamp = null;
timestamp = Date.now();
timestamp = performance.now();
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Date.now() | |
performance.now() |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Date.now() | 6896867.5 Ops/sec |
performance.now() | 3819777.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!
Benchmark Definition JSON
The provided benchmark definition JSON represents two test cases, each comparing different approaches to measure time in JavaScript.
Date.now()
without any modifications.performance.now()
without any modifications.Options Compared
The two options being compared are:
Date.now()
: A built-in JavaScript function that returns the number of milliseconds since January 1, 1970, 00:00:00 UTC.performance.now()
: A high-resolution timer provided by the Performance
API, which returns the elapsed time in fractional seconds.Pros and Cons
Both options have their advantages and disadvantages:
Date.now()
:
performance.now()
:
Date.now()
.Date.now()
, resulting in more reliable results.Library
In the test cases provided, no libraries are explicitly mentioned. However, Performance
API is part of the standard JavaScript library in modern browsers.
Special JS Features or Syntax
The benchmark uses the var timestamp = null;
syntax for variable declaration and assignment. This is a valid JavaScript feature that allows for block-level scope and redeclaration without error. It's used here to initialize the timestamp
variables before measuring their execution times.
Benchmark Preparation Code
The preparation code, "var timestamp = null;"
, sets up a blank scope where the benchmark function can be executed. In the first test case, it prepares to measure the time taken by Date.now()
. In the second test case, it prepares to measure the time taken by performance.now()
.
Latest Benchmark Result
The latest result shows the execution times for both tests in Firefox 107 on a Mac OS X 10.15 desktop:
Date.now()
: Approximately 9.46 million executions per second.performance.now()
: Approximately 5.81 million executions per second.These results indicate that performance.now()
generally provides more accurate timing due to its higher resolution and reduced impact from factors like system clock adjustments or scheduling algorithms.
Alternatives
If you're looking for alternatives, here are a few options:
Date.now()
: Useful for general-purpose timing needs but might not be suitable for high-precision applications.performance.now()
: Ideal for measuring time intervals in fractional seconds and is recommended for most use cases where accuracy is crucial.Keep in mind that the choice between these two methods depends on your specific requirements, the level of precision needed, and the compatibility with different browsers and devices.