Date.now();
performance.now();
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Date.now() | |
performance.now() |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Date.now() | 3906800.5 Ops/sec |
performance.now() | 1954429.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark definition is an object with three properties: Name
, Description
, and two optional properties Script Preparation Code
and Html Preparation Code
. However, in this case, both of these properties are null. The Name
field specifies the name of the benchmark, which is "Date.now() vs performance.now()". The Description
field is empty, which means no description for this benchmark.
Individual Test Cases
The benchmark has two individual test cases:
Date.now()
: This test case measures the time taken by the Date.now()
function to execute.performance.now()
: This test case measures the time taken by the performance.now()
function to execute.Libraries and Special Features
Neither of the test cases uses any external libraries, so there's no library to describe. However, both functions are built-in JavaScript methods:
Date.now()
: Returns the number of milliseconds since January 1, 1970, at 00:00:00 UTC.performance.now()
: Returns the number of microseconds since performance timing began.Options Compared
The two test cases compare the time taken by Date.now()
and performance.now()
to execute. The main difference between these two functions is their resolution:
Date.now()
returns milliseconds, which may not be precise enough for high-performance applications.performance.now()
returns microseconds, which provides a more precise measurement of time.Pros and Cons
Here's a summary of the pros and cons of each function:
Date.now()
Pros:
Cons:
performance.now()
Pros:
Date.now()
Cons:
Other Alternatives
If you need a different way to measure time, here are some alternatives:
new Date().getTime()
(similar to Date.now()
)requestAnimationFrame()
with a callback function (for more precise timing)navigator.mediaDevices.getUserMedia()
or performance.getEntriesByType('resource')
for measuring performanceKeep in mind that each of these alternatives has its own trade-offs and limitations, so choose the one that best suits your specific use case.
In this benchmark, it's clear that the user is interested in comparing the execution time of two built-in JavaScript functions with different precision. The results will help users understand which function to use depending on their specific requirements.