Benchmark: Get min value from array of objects' value 2

Script Preparation code:

var items = [{
        val: 7
    },
    {
        val: 9
    },
    {
        val: 8
    },
    {
        val: 3
    },
    {
        val: 12
    },
    {
        val: 34
    },
    {
        val: 7
    },
    {
        val: 512
    }
]

Tests:

Map and Math.min
Math.min(...items.map(item => item.val))
Reduce without initial value
items.reduce((acc, current) => acc < current.val ? acc : current.val)
Reduce with initial value
items.reduce((acc, current) => acc < current.val ? acc : current.val, items[0].val)
Reduce without initial value 2
items.reduce((acc, current) => acc > current.val ? current.val : acc)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Map and Math.min
Reduce without initial value
Reduce with initial value
Reduce without initial value 2

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_4) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/84.0.4147.89 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 84 on Mac OS X 10.15.4

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Map and Math.min	3553170.0 Ops/sec
Reduce without initial value	5112774.0 Ops/sec
Reduce with initial value	3686866.0 Ops/sec
Reduce without initial value 2	1440307.0 Ops/sec

Get min value from array of objects' value 2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Map and Math.min vs Reduce without initial value vs Reduce with initial value vs Reduce without initial value 2

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Map and Math.min

Reduce without initial value

Reduce with initial value

Reduce without initial value 2

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A