var aaa = [1,2,3];
var bbb = [2,3,4];
var term = 1;
aaa.indexOf(term) > -1 || bbb.indexOf(term) > -1
aaa.concat(bbb).indexOf(term) > -1
[aaa, bbb].indexOf(term) > -1
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
separate | |
concat | |
cool concat |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
separate | 5383342.0 Ops/sec |
concat | 2286966.0 Ops/sec |
cool concat | 3065452.2 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
Benchmark Overview
The provided benchmark tests three different approaches to find an element in two arrays: indexOf
, concat
, and a more modern approach using the spread operator (...
). The benchmark aims to determine which method is the most efficient.
Script Preparation Code
The script preparation code initializes two arrays, aaa
and bbb
, with some sample values. It also sets up a variable term
to be searched for in both arrays.
var aaa = [1,2,3];
var bbb = [2,3,4];
var term = 1;
Html Preparation Code
There is no HTML preparation code provided, which means that the benchmark focuses solely on the JavaScript implementation.
Test Cases
The test cases are defined in the following JSON array:
[
{
"Benchmark Definition": "aaa.indexOf(term) > -1 || bbb.indexOf(term) > -1",
"Test Name": "separate"
},
{
"Benchmark Definition": "aaa.concat(bbb).indexOf(term) > -1",
"Test Name": "concat"
},
{
"Benchmark Definition": "[...aaa, ...bbb].indexOf(term) > -1",
"Test Name": "cool concat"
}
]
Each test case defines a different benchmarking scenario:
separate
: Directly calls indexOf
on both arrays individually and checks if the term exists in either of them.concat
: Concatenates the two arrays using the spread operator (...
) and then calls indexOf
on the resulting array to find the term.cool concat
: Similar to concat
, but uses the spread operator (...
) to concatenate the arrays. This approach is more modern and efficient.Library Used
None of the test cases use any external libraries, which means that the results are specific to vanilla JavaScript implementation.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
The benchmark does not specifically target any special JavaScript features or syntax. However, it does demonstrate a modern approach using the spread operator (...
), which is a standard feature in modern JavaScript implementations.
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Here's a brief analysis of each approach:
separate
: This method is straightforward but may lead to slower performance due to the need to search for the term in both arrays individually.concat
: Concatenating the arrays using the spread operator can be efficient, as it allows the browser to optimize the array creation process. However, this approach may incur additional overhead due to the temporary array creation.cool concat
: This modern approach using the spread operator is likely to be the most efficient, as it avoids creating a temporary array and directly searches for the term in the concatenated array.Other Alternatives
Some alternative approaches that could have been tested include:
find
instead of indexOf
, which may provide better performance due to early termination.However, these alternatives are not explored in the provided benchmark.