var a = false, b = false, c = false, d = true;
var c = a || b || c || d;
var d = [a, b, c, d].find((element) => element);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
or operator | |
array |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
or operator | 7828945.5 Ops/sec |
array | 8686412.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark tests two different approaches to evaluate a logical expression: using the ||
(OR) operator versus searching for an element in an array using the find()
method. The test cases are identical, except for the approach used to evaluate the expression.
Approach 1: OR Operator (||
)
The first approach uses the OR operator (||
) to evaluate the logical expression a || b || c || d
. This operator returns true
if any of the operands (in this case, a
, b
, c
, or d
) is true
.
Pros:
Cons:
Approach 2: Array Search (find()
method)
The second approach uses the find()
method on an array containing the values a
, b
, c
, and d
. The expression becomes [a, b, c, d].find((element) => element)
.
Pros:
Cons:
Library/Function Used
In this benchmark, the find()
method is used on an array. The find()
method returns the first element in the array that satisfies the provided condition (in this case, element => element
).
The callback function (element) => element
is a shorthand for a traditional if
statement: if the current element (element
) is equal to itself, it returns true.
Other Considerations
Script Preparation Code
section defines four variables (a
, b
, c
, and d
) with different values, which are then used in the logical expressions.Alternatives
Other alternatives to these approaches could include:
&&
for AND, !
for NOT) or bitwise operators.Keep in mind that the specific choice of approach will depend on the requirements of the application, performance considerations, and platform-specific constraints.