Benchmark: multi or operator vs array.find

Script Preparation code:

var a = false, b = false, c = false, d = true;

Tests:

or operator
var c = a || b || c || d;
array
var d = [a, b, c, d].find((element) => element);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
or operator
array

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/109.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 109 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
or operator	7828945.5 Ops/sec
array	8686412.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark tests two different approaches to evaluate a logical expression: using the `||` (OR) operator versus searching for an element in an array using the `find()` method. The test cases are identical, except for the approach used to evaluate the expression.

**Approach 1: OR Operator (`||`)**

The first approach uses the OR operator (`||`) to evaluate the logical expression `a || b || c || d`. This operator returns `true` if any of the operands (in this case, `a`, `b`, `c`, or `d`) is `true`.

Pros:

* Simple and straightforward implementation.
* Fast execution speed.

Cons:

* May be slower for longer chains of OR operators due to the overhead of evaluating each operand separately.

**Approach 2: Array Search (`find()` method)**

The second approach uses the `find()` method on an array containing the values `a`, `b`, `c`, and `d`. The expression becomes `[a, b, c, d].find((element) => element)`.

Pros:

* Can be faster for longer chains of OR operators, as it only requires a single pass through the array.
* May be more efficient when dealing with large numbers of operands.

Cons:

* Requires creating an array and defining a callback function, which can add overhead.
* May be slower due to the additional memory allocation and garbage collection.

**Library/Function Used**

In this benchmark, the `find()` method is used on an array. The `find()` method returns the first element in the array that satisfies the provided condition (in this case, `element => element`).

The callback function `(element) => element` is a shorthand for a traditional `if` statement: if the current element (`element`) is equal to itself, it returns true.

**Other Considerations**

* The benchmark uses Chrome 109 as the browser and Mac OS X 10.15.7 as the operating system.
* The test cases are identical except for the approach used to evaluate the expression.
* The `Script Preparation Code` section defines four variables (`a`, `b`, `c`, and `d`) with different values, which are then used in the logical expressions.

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives to these approaches could include:

* Using other logical operators (e.g., `&&` for AND, `!` for NOT) or bitwise operators.
* Implementing custom logic using loops, conditional statements, and arithmetic operations.
* Utilizing optimized libraries or frameworks that provide built-in support for logical expressions or array searching.

Keep in mind that the specific choice of approach will depend on the requirements of the application, performance considerations, and platform-specific constraints.

Related benchmarks:

multi or operator vs array.find (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: or operator vs array

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

or operator

array

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):