random = () => Array(50).fill(Math.floor(Math.random() * 9))
const arr1 = random();
const arr2 = random();
const other = arr1.concat(arr2);
const arr1 = random();
const arr2 = random();
const other = [ arr1, arr2]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | |
spread operator |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | 389387.5 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 358193.9 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the benchmark and explain what's being tested, the options compared, their pros and cons, and other considerations.
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents two test cases for comparing the performance of the Array.prototype.concat
method with the new ES6 spread operator (...
). The benchmark is designed to measure which approach is faster in JavaScript.
Options compared:
concat()
method: This is a built-in Array method that concatenates two or more arrays and returns a new array....
): This operator allows you to expand an iterable (such as an array) into individual elements.Pros and Cons of each approach:
concat()
method:...
):concat()
as it avoids creating a new array and uses the existing one's length and index information.Library used:
In neither of the test cases is a library explicitly mentioned. However, it's likely that the benchmark uses an engine like V8 (used by Google Chrome) or SpiderMonkey (used by Mozilla Firefox) to execute the JavaScript code.
Special JS feature or syntax:
There are no special features or syntaxes used in this benchmark that would require specific knowledge of advanced JavaScript topics. The benchmark focuses on comparing two well-known and widely supported methods for concatenating arrays.
Other alternatives:
If you're interested in exploring alternative methods for array concatenation, here are a few examples:
Array.prototype.push()
: This method can be used to append elements to an array, but it's not the most efficient way to concatenate two arrays.reduce()
: Some developers use reduce()
with the initial value set to an empty array and accumulate the concatenation process, which can also lead to performance issues.Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be as optimized or well-supported as the traditional concat()
method or the spread operator.
In summary, the benchmark is designed to measure the performance difference between two common methods for concatenating arrays in JavaScript: the traditional concat()
method and the new ES6 spread operator (...
). The results can help developers understand which approach is more efficient and make informed decisions about code optimization.