<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
var array1 = (new Array(10000)).fill(Math.random(), 0, 9999);
var array2 = (new Array(10000)).fill(Math.random(), 0, 9999);
var other = array1.concat(array2);
var other = [ array1, array2 ]
var other = _.merge([], array1, array2);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | |
spread operator | |
Lodash merge |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | 2990.7 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 2668.6 Ops/sec |
Lodash merge | 213.4 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark.
What is tested?
The benchmark tests three different approaches to concatenate two arrays:
Array.prototype.concat()
: The traditional method for concatenating arrays in JavaScript....
): The new ES6 syntax for spreading array elements into a new array.merge()
function: A utility function from the popular JavaScript library Lodash that merges two or more arrays into one.Options compared
The benchmark compares these three approaches on an immutable data requirement, creating fresh arrays for each case.
Pros and Cons of each approach
Array.prototype.concat()
:...
)concat()
for large arrays. Also, it's a concise and expressive way to concatenate arrays.merge()
function:Library and purpose
Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a comprehensive set of functions for various tasks, such as array manipulation, string manipulation, and more. The merge()
function in particular is designed to merge two or more arrays into one, handling edge cases like null or undefined values.
Special JS feature or syntax
There's no specific special JS feature or syntax used in this benchmark apart from the use of ES6 spread operator (...
), which requires modern JavaScript versions. However, it's worth noting that Lodash is a popular library and using its functions can provide a standardized way to perform common tasks.
Other alternatives
If you don't want to use the spread operator or Lodash's merge()
function, you could consider other approaches:
concat()
method with a loop: var other = []; while (array1.length > 0) { other.push(array1.shift()); if (array2.length > 0) { other.push(array2.shift()); } }
push()
: var other = [array1, array2];
However, these alternatives are generally less efficient than the spread operator or Lodash's merge()
function.
In summary, the benchmark provides a useful comparison of three approaches to concatenate arrays in JavaScript: traditional concat()
, modern spread operator, and standardized Lodash merge()
function.