<div id="foo">foo bar foo bar foo bar foo bar</div>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.4.1/jquery.js'></script>
var foo = $("#foo");
foo.empty();
foo.html("");
foo[0].innerHTML = "";
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
empty | |
html | |
innerHtml |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
empty | 7969051.5 Ops/sec |
html | 4075484.5 Ops/sec |
innerHtml | 35260900.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON data to understand what is being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The test case uses jQuery, a popular JavaScript library for DOM manipulation and event handling. The benchmark compares three different approaches:
foo.empty()
: This method clears all child nodes of an element without removing the element itself.foo.html("")
: This method sets the HTML content of an element to an empty string, effectively clearing it.foo[0].innerHTML = ""
: This approach directly modifies the innerHTML property of the first child node of the element.Pros and Cons
foo.empty()
: Pros:html()
method on an element that already has a specific HTML content).foo.html("")
: Pros:foo.empty()
, as it requires setting the HTML content to an empty string.foo[0].innerHTML = ""
: Pros:Library: jQuery
jQuery is a lightweight JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation and event handling. It provides an easy-to-use API for selecting elements, manipulating their content, and attaching events to them. In this benchmark, jQuery's empty()
method is used to compare different approaches for clearing the content of an element.
Special JS Feature/Syntax: None
There are no specific JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing different methods for clearing the content of an element using a popular library like jQuery.
Other Alternatives
If you were to implement these benchmarks without using jQuery, you could consider alternative approaches:
element.remove()
or element.innerHTML = ""
).Element.prototype.innerHTML
property).Keep in mind that each approach has its pros and cons, and the choice of implementation will depend on your specific use case and performance requirements.
I hope this explanation helps you understand the benchmark and its test cases!