<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="foo">Hello World</div>
var d = "<p>test</p>"
$('#foo').text(d);
$('#foo').html(d);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
insert per text | |
insert per html |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
insert per text | 738673.3 Ops/sec |
insert per html | 268554.6 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested, compared options, pros/cons, and other considerations.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark defines two test cases:
$("#foo").text(d);
: This line of code inserts the text content (d
) into an HTML element with the id foo
.$("#foo").html(d);
: This line of code inserts the full HTML content (including markup) into an HTML element with the id foo
.Script and Html Preparation Code
The script preparation code creates a string variable d
containing the text content: "<p>test</p>"
. The html preparation code includes a reference to the jQuery library and defines a simple HTML structure (<div id="foo">Hello World</div>
).
Options Compared
Two approaches are compared:
.text(d)
): This approach inserts only the text content into the element..html(d)
): This approach inserts the full HTML content, including markup, into the element.Pros and Cons
$.text(d)
):$.html(d)
):Library: jQuery
The benchmark uses jQuery (version 3.1.1), a popular JavaScript library for DOM manipulation and event handling. The $.text()
and $.html()
methods are used to insert text and HTML content into the element, respectively.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There is no explicit mention of any special JavaScript features or syntax being used in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that using jQuery can provide additional functionality beyond simple DOM manipulation, such as event handling and animation.
Other Alternatives
If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches to testing the performance of text and HTML insertion methods, consider the following options:
Keep in mind that these alternatives might require additional setup, configuration, or modifications to your existing codebase.