Benchmark: Math.abs vs .includes

Tests:

Math.abs()
const diff = Math.abs(-1); if ((diff == 1) || (diff == 0)){ return true; } else { return false; }
.includes()
const diff = [-1, 0, 1]; if (diff.includes(-1)) { return true; } else { return false; }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Math.abs()
.includes()

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 9; SAMSUNG SM-G611MT) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) SamsungBrowser/16.2 Chrome/92.0.4515.166 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome Mobile 92 on Android

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Math.abs()	581241.8 Ops/sec
.includes()	97205610.0 Ops/sec

Math.abs vs .includes (version: 2)

Comparing performance of: Math.abs() vs .includes()

Created: 3 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Math.abs()

.includes()

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A