Benchmark: Math.abs vs binary Math.abs

Script Preparation code:

var nr = -8765

Tests:

Math.abs
var result = Math.abs(nr)
binary
var result = nr ^ (nr >> 31) - (nr >> 31)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Math.abs
binary

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.1:latest, generated 27 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into what's being tested and compared in this benchmark.

**What is being tested?**

This benchmark compares two different ways to calculate the absolute value of a number using JavaScript:

1. `Math.abs(nr)` (using the built-in `Math.abs()` function)
2. `nr ^ (nr >> 31) - (nr >> 31)` (a binary implementation)

**What is being compared?**

The main options being compared are two different algorithms for calculating the absolute value of a number:

1. **Built-in Math.abs() function**: This is a straightforward and efficient way to calculate the absolute value, using the built-in `Math.abs()` function provided by JavaScript.
2. **Binary implementation**: This is an alternative approach that uses bitwise operations (`^` and `>>`) to calculate the absolute value. It's a more low-level and mathematical way of doing things.

**Pros/Cons of each approach:**

1. **Built-in Math.abs() function**:
	* Pros: Easy to use, efficient, and widely supported.
	* Cons: May not be as performant as optimized implementations on certain platforms or browsers.
2. **Binary implementation**:
	* Pros: Can be faster than the built-in function on some platforms or browsers, especially when dealing with large numbers.
	* Cons: More complex to understand and implement, may require additional knowledge of bitwise operations.

**Library/Feature used:**

No external libraries or special JavaScript features are used in this benchmark.

**Other considerations:**

This benchmark is useful for understanding the performance differences between these two algorithms on various platforms and browsers. The results can help developers make informed decisions when choosing between these approaches in their own code.

**Alternatives:**

If you need to calculate the absolute value of a number, you could also consider using:

1. `Math.sign(nr) * nr` (using the built-in `Math.sign()` function)
2. Other optimized implementations, such as those using SIMD instructions or other specialized algorithms.
3. Rounding libraries like `decimal.js` or `bignumber.js`, which can handle large numbers and provide precise calculations.

Keep in mind that these alternatives may have their own trade-offs and use cases, and the best approach will depend on your specific requirements and constraints.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:48.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/48.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 48 on Mac OS X 10.6

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Math.abs	83026960.0 Ops/sec
binary	88243400.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Math.abs vs binary Math.abs (version: 0)

comparers Math.abs vs binary ( nr ^ (nr >> 31) - (nr >> 31)) )

Comparing performance of: Math.abs vs binary

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Math.abs

binary

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.1:latest, generated 27 days ago):