Benchmark: getElementById vs querySelector ID vs getElementsByClassName vs querySelectorAll

HTML Preparation code:

<div id="test_element_id" class="test_element_class"></div>

Tests:

getElementById
var el = document.getElementById('test_element_id'); var className = el.className;
querySelector
var el = document.querySelector('#test_element_id'); var className = el.className;
getElementsByClassName
var el = document.getElementsByClassName('test_element_class')[0]; var className = el.className;
querySelectorAll
var el = document.querySelectorAll('.test_element_class')[0]; var className = el.className;
querySelector class
var el = document.querySelector('.test_element_class'); var className = el.className;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
getElementById
querySelector
getElementsByClassName
querySelectorAll
querySelector class

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Measuring the performance of different DOM selection methods in JavaScript is crucial for optimizing web applications' loading times and responsiveness.

The provided JSON benchmark definition represents a set of tests to compare the performance of four DOM selection methods:

1. `document.getElementById`
2. `document.querySelector` (with an ID selector)
3. `document.getElementsByClassName` (with a class selector)
4. `document.querySelectorAll` (with a class selector)

Let's break down each option and its pros and cons:

**1. `document.getElementById`**

* Purpose: Selects the first element with the specified ID.
* Pros:
	+ Simple to use and understand.
	+ Works well for single elements with unique IDs.
* Cons:
	+ Returns only the first matching element, which can lead to unexpected behavior if there are multiple elements with the same ID.
	+ May not be optimized for performance in modern browsers.

**2. `document.querySelector` (with an ID selector)**

* Purpose: Selects the first element that matches the specified CSS selector.
* Pros:
	+ More flexible than `getElementById`, as it can match multiple elements or use attribute selectors.
	+ Works well for selecting elements based on their class, type, or other attributes.
* Cons:
	+ May not be optimized for performance in modern browsers.

**3. `document.getElementsByClassName`**

* Purpose: Returns a collection of elements that match the specified class name.
* Pros:
	+ Allows multiple matching elements to be selected.
	+ Works well for selecting elements based on their class names.
* Cons:
	+ Returns an array-like object, which can lead to unexpected behavior if not handled correctly.
	+ May not be optimized for performance in modern browsers.

**4. `document.querySelectorAll`**

* Purpose: Returns a collection of elements that match the specified CSS selector.
* Pros:
	+ Similar to `querySelector`, but returns multiple matching elements.
	+ Works well for selecting elements based on their class, type, or other attributes.
* Cons:
	+ May not be optimized for performance in modern browsers.

The provided benchmark results show the performance of each method, with `document.getElementById` being the fastest (3639497.75 executions per second) and `document.querySelectorAll` being the slowest (1124596.5 executions per second).

Other alternatives to consider:

* `document.querySelectorAll`: Similar to `querySelector`, but returns all matching elements instead of a single element.
* Using CSS selectors with modern browsers: Modern browsers have improved their performance for using CSS selectors, making it possible to use methods like `querySelector` and `querySelectorAll` more efficiently.

In summary, the choice of DOM selection method depends on the specific requirements of your application. If you need to select a single element based on its ID, `document.getElementById` is a good choice. For selecting multiple elements or using class selectors, `document.querySelector`, `document.getElementsByClassName`, and `document.querySelectorAll` are more suitable options.

When writing code, it's essential to consider the trade-offs between performance, readability, and maintainability when choosing the optimal DOM selection method for your use case.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 days ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/130.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 130 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
getElementById	2999357.0 Ops/sec
querySelector	1906399.1 Ops/sec
getElementsByClassName	2379912.2 Ops/sec
querySelectorAll	1390923.2 Ops/sec
querySelector class	2453756.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

getElementById vs querySelector ID vs getElementsByClassName vs querySelectorAll (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: getElementById vs querySelector vs getElementsByClassName vs querySelectorAll vs querySelector class

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

getElementById

querySelector

getElementsByClassName

querySelectorAll

querySelector class

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):