<div class="test"></div>
document.querySelector(".test")
document.getElementsByClassName(".test")[0]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
querySelector | |
getElementsByClassName |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
querySelector | 9306032.0 Ops/sec |
getElementsByClassName | 5172567.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested, compared, and some considerations.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark defines two test cases: querySelector
and getElementsByClassName
. These are JavaScript methods used to select elements in HTML documents.
What is being tested?
document.querySelector('.test')
: This method selects the first element with the class test
.document.getElementsByClassName('test')[0]
: This method returns an array of elements with the class test
and returns the first element from that array.Options compared
The benchmark is comparing two approaches to select elements:
querySelector
was introduced in modern browsers.Pros and Cons
getElementsByClassName
.querySelector
. It's also more flexible when dealing with elements without a class attribute.querySelector
.Library usage
In the benchmark, document
is used as the root element of the HTML document. There are no external libraries being used.
Special JS features or syntax
There are none mentioned in this specific benchmark. However, it's worth noting that other benchmarks might use newer JavaScript features like async/await, Promises, or modern language constructs like arrow functions or destructuring.
Other alternatives
For selecting elements, you can also use other methods like:
querySelectorAll
: Similar to querySelector
, but returns a NodeList with all matching elements.document.querySelector~
and document.querySelectorAll~
: These use a substring matching approach for partial matches.Keep in mind that the best method for your specific use case depends on factors like browser support, performance requirements, and complexity.