<div id="testElement0">
<div id="testElement1">
<div id="testElement2"></div>
</div>
</div>
var container = document.getElementById('testElement0');
var el = document.getElementById('testElement2');
var className = el.className;
var el = container.querySelector('#testElement2');
var className = el.className;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
getElementById | |
querySelector |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
getElementById | 4898627.5 Ops/sec |
querySelector | 7049202.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON data for the MeasureThat.net benchmark.
What is being tested?
The benchmark tests two ways to select an HTML element in JavaScript: document.getElementById
and container.querySelector
. Specifically, it compares the execution times of these methods when selecting a nested element (testElement2
) within another container element (testElement1
) that is itself located on the page using document.getElementById
.
Options being compared
There are two options being compared:
document.getElementById('testElement2')
: This method uses the id
attribute of an HTML element to select it.container.querySelector('#testElement2')
: This method uses a CSS selector (#testElement2
) to select an element within a container.Pros and Cons
document.getElementById('testElement2')
:id
attribute on the target element, which might not always be available or desired.container.querySelector('#testElement2')
:getElementById
, allowing for more complex CSS selectors.Library usage
Neither of the methods explicitly uses a library. However, if you consider querySelector
as part of the DOM API (which is a built-in feature of most JavaScript engines), then there's no external library involved.
Special JS features or syntax
None are mentioned in this benchmark. If there were any, they would be relevant to understanding the specific requirements and constraints of the test case.
Other alternatives
If you're looking for alternative methods to select HTML elements, some other options include:
document.querySelector()
with a different CSS selector (e.g., .class
, [attribute]
).getElementsByClassName()
, getElementByTagName()
, or getElementsByTagName()
to select elements based on their class name, tag name, or attribute.Array.prototype.map()
method to create an array of selected elements and then iterate over it.However, these alternatives may not be as efficient as using querySelector
with a CSS selector, especially for simple selections.
In summary, this benchmark tests two common methods for selecting HTML elements in JavaScript: document.getElementById
and container.querySelector
. It compares their execution times when used to select a nested element within another container. The choice between these methods depends on the specific requirements of your project, including browser support and complexity of CSS selectors.