<div id="testElement"></div>
var el = document.getElementById('testElement');
var el = document.querySelector('#testElement');
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
getElementById | |
querySelector |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
getElementById | 3570733.0 Ops/sec |
querySelector | 3931719.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Overview
The benchmark compares the performance of two methods to retrieve an HTML element: document.getElementById
(also known as the "old way") and document.querySelector
. The test checks which method is faster for a specific scenario, where an HTML div with the id "testElement" is created.
Options Compared
Two options are being compared:
document.getElementById
: This method retrieves an element by its ID using the getElementById
function. It's a legacy method that has been around since HTML 3.2 (1997).document.querySelector
: This method retrieves elements that match a specified CSS selector using the querySelector
function. It was introduced in HTML5 and is more flexible than getElementById
.Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
document.getElementById
:document.querySelector
:getElementById
, allowing for more efficient searching of elements using CSS selectors. It's also generally faster than getElementById
.Library/Features Used
Neither library or feature is explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition, but we can infer some characteristics:
document
object, which is part of the browser's global scope.querySelector
method is used with a simple CSS selector (#testElement
), which implies that it requires parsing and executing a CSS query.Special JS Features/Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark. It only uses standard JavaScript functions and syntax, such as variable declarations and assignment.
Alternatives
Other alternatives to document.getElementById
and document.querySelector
include:
querySelectorAll
: Similar to querySelector
, but returns a NodeList with all elements that match the selector.getElementsByClassName
or getElementByTagName
: These methods retrieve elements based on their class names or tag names, respectively.In summary, this benchmark compares the performance of two common methods for retrieving HTML elements in JavaScript: document.getElementById
and document.querySelector
. The test shows that querySelector
is generally faster than getElementById
, but only when optimized with a well-crafted CSS selector.