Benchmark: getElementById vs querySelector vs getElementsByClassName vs getElementsByName FIXED

getElementById vs querySelector vs getElementsByClassName vs getElementsByName FIXED (version: 0)

Test performance of different ways of get just one particular DOM element - using each method's strengths, instead of biasing towards getElementById.

Comparing performance of: getElementById vs getElementsByTagName vs querySelector vs getElementsByClassName vs getElementsByName

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

HTML Preparation code:

<div id="testdiv">
  <div id="unique" class="unique" name="unique" data-unique="1">test</div>
</div>

Script Preparation code:

var i, imax;
var doc = document;

Tests:

getElementById
var test = doc.getElementById('testdiv').childNodes[0].innerHTML;
getElementsByTagName
var formelem = doc.getElementsByTagName('div')[1].innerHTML;
querySelector
var test = doc.querySelector('#testdiv > .unique').innerHTML;
getElementsByClassName
var test = doc.getElementsByClassName('unique')[0].innerHTML;
getElementsByName
var test = doc.getElementsByName('unique')[0].innerHTML;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
getElementById
getElementsByTagName
querySelector
getElementsByClassName
getElementsByName

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.1:latest, generated 26 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down what's being tested and analyzed in this benchmark.

**What is being tested?**

The test cases are comparing the performance of different methods to retrieve a single DOM element from an HTML document:

1. `getElementById`
2. `getElementsByTagName` (with a specific index)
3. `querySelector` (using a CSS selector)
4. `getElementsByClassName` (with a specific class name)
5. `getElementsByName` (with a specific name)

**Options being compared**

The test cases are comparing the execution time of each method in retrieving the specified DOM element.

**Pros and Cons of different approaches**

Here's a brief summary:

* **getElementById**: This method is the most straightforward, but it relies on the presence of an `id` attribute. If the element doesn't have an `id`, this method will return null.
	+ Pros: Fastest method when an `id` is present.
	+ Cons: Returns null if no `id` is found.
* **getElementsByTagName**: This method returns a collection of elements with a specified tag name. To get a single element, you need to specify the index (e.g., `[1]`).
	+ Pros: Can be fast when using a common HTML element like `<div>`.
	+ Cons: Returns an array, so you need to access the correct index.
* **querySelector**: This method uses CSS selectors to retrieve elements. It's more flexible than `getElementById`, as it can select elements based on various attributes (not just `id`).
	+ Pros: Can select multiple types of elements using a single selector.
	+ Cons: Might be slower due to the complexity of the selector engine.
* **getElementsByClassName**: Similar to `querySelector`, but uses class names instead of CSS selectors. Returns an array of elements with the specified class name.
	+ Pros: Fast when selecting elements by class name.
	+ Cons: Returns an array, so you need to access the correct index.
* **getElementsByName**: Returns a collection of elements with a specific `name` attribute. Like `getElementsByTagName`, it's not suitable for retrieving a single element without specifying the index.
	+ Pros: Can be fast when using a common HTML attribute like `<input name="...">`.
	+ Cons: Returns an array, so you need to access the correct index.

**Other considerations**

The test cases assume that the HTML document is already loaded and parsed by the browser. The results might vary depending on the specific HTML structure, JavaScript engine used, and other factors affecting performance.

**Special JS feature or syntax**

No special JavaScript features or syntax are being tested in these test cases. The code uses standard DOM methods and properties.

**Other alternatives**

If you need to retrieve multiple elements, consider using:

* `querySelectorAll` (for CSS selectors)
* `getElementsByClassName` (for class names)
* `getElementsByTagName` (for tag names)

Alternatively, use a library or framework like jQuery or Lodash that provides more efficient methods for DOM manipulation.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 4 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/84.0.4147.125 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 84 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
getElementById	5498678.5 Ops/sec
getElementsByTagName	2329073.0 Ops/sec
querySelector	2511734.2 Ops/sec
getElementsByClassName	2700933.0 Ops/sec
getElementsByName	2712033.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

getElementById vs querySelector vs getElementsByClassName vs getElementsByName FIXED (version: 0)

Test performance of different ways of get just one particular DOM element - using each method's strengths, instead of biasing towards getElementById.

Comparing performance of: getElementById vs getElementsByTagName vs querySelector vs getElementsByClassName vs getElementsByName

Created: 4 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

getElementById

getElementsByTagName

querySelector

getElementsByClassName

getElementsByName

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.1:latest, generated 26 days ago):