<div id="testdiv">
<div id="unique" class="unique" name="unique" data-unique="1">test</div>
</div>
var i, imax;
var doc = document;
var test = doc.getElementById('unique');
var test = doc.getElementsByClassName('unique')[0]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
getElementById | |
getElementsByClassName |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
getElementById | 7349160.5 Ops/sec |
getElementsByClassName | 4348753.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark json and explain what is tested, compared options, pros/cons, and other considerations.
What is being tested:
The benchmark tests two different approaches to retrieve a single DOM element:
getElementById
: This method retrieves an element by its id attribute.getElementsByClassName
(specifically, [0]
, which returns the first element): This method retrieves elements that match a specific class name.Options being compared:
The benchmark compares the performance of these two approaches in retrieving a single DOM element.
Pros and Cons:
getElementById
:getElementsByClassName
getElementsByClassName
([0]
):Library and purpose:
In the provided benchmark, no external library is used. The test code only uses the built-in JavaScript DOM methods.
Special JS feature or syntax:
None of the special features or syntax are mentioned in the benchmark. However, it's worth noting that getElementsByClassName
returns an array-like object, so when retrieving a single element using [0]
, we're essentially returning the first (and only) element from the array.
Other alternatives:
For retrieving a single DOM element, other approaches might include:
querySelector
or querySelectorAll
with a CSS selectorKeep in mind that these alternatives would likely introduce additional overhead and may not be as efficient as the two methods being compared.
The provided benchmark is designed to help developers understand the performance differences between getElementById
and getElementsByClassName
when retrieving a single DOM element.